###
中国临床研究:2020,33(6):815-817,821
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨或替吉奥在晚期胃癌中的近期疗效比较
(安徽省芜湖市第二人民医院肿瘤内科,安徽 芜湖 241000)
Comparison of the short-term efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine or S-1 in advanced gastric cancer
(Department of Oncology, the Second People′s Hospital of Wuhu Municipal, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 640次   下载 405
投稿时间:2019-09-09   网络发布日期:2020-06-20
中文摘要: 目的 探讨晚期胃癌常用方案奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨(XELOX)与奥沙利铂联合替吉奥(SOX)的近期疗效与不良反应对比分析。方法 回顾性分析2016年6月至2019年6月肿瘤内科收治的晚期胃癌患者50例,按照化疗方案分为奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨组(20例)与奥沙利铂联合替吉奥组(30例),观察分析两组的疗效及不良反应,同时分析预后的相关因素。结果 XELOX组客观缓解率35.0%,疾病控制率65.0%;SOX组客观缓解率33.3%,疾病控制率60.0%,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后XELOX组多表现为Ⅱ~Ⅲ度的白细胞下降及Ⅰ~Ⅱ度的手足综合征及腹泻,SOX组多表现为Ⅱ~Ⅲ度的血小板下降;XELOX组手足综合征反应多于SOX组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 XELOX与SOX方案近期疗效差异不明显,对晚期胃癌均有一定治疗疗效,且不良反应耐受,均可作为一线首选方案。肿瘤原发部位可能与预后相关;腹膜转移患者预后较差。
Abstract:Objecitve To compare the short-term efficacy and adverse reactions of oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine (XELOX) and oxaliplatin combined with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium(S-1) (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods Fifty patients with advanced gastric cancer from June 2016 to June 2019 were studied retrospectively.According to different chemotherapy regimen, they were divided into oxaliplatin combined with capecitabine group (XELOX group, n=20) and oxaliplatin combined with tegio group (SOX group, n=30).The efficacy and adverse reactions were observed and compared between two groups, and the related factors of prognosis were analyzed. Results There were no significant differences in objective remission rate(35.0% vs 33.3%) and disease control rate (65.0% vs 60.0%)between XELOX group and SOX group (P>0.05).After treatment, leukocyte decline (grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ), hand and foot syndrome(gradeⅠ-Ⅱ) and diarrhea mostly occurred in XELOX group, while platelet decline (grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ) occurred mainly in SOX group.The incidence of hand-and-foot syndrome in XELOX group was significantly higher than that in SOX group(P<0.01). Conclusion Both XELOX and SOX have a certain therapeutic effect on advanced gastric cancer and similar short-term curative effect with tolerable adverse reactions and could be used as the first-line treatment of choice without significant difference in the short-term curative effect.The primary site of tumor may be related to prognosis of patients, and the prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastasis is poor.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:B
基金项目:安徽省博士后研究人员科研活动经费资助项目(2017B194)
引用文本:
朱凌燕,王秀明,李超群.奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨或替吉奥在晚期胃癌中的近期疗效比较[J].中国临床研究,2020,33(6):815-817,821.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫