###
中国临床研究英文版:2025,38(1):16-21
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗黏膜下层早期贲门癌和非贲门癌的效果及安全
(1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院消化内科,江苏 南京 210008;2. 南京市江宁医院消化内科,江苏 南京 210000;3. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院中西医结合肿瘤科,安徽 合肥 230000)
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of early cardia cancer and non-cardia cancer with submucosal infiltration
摘要
本文已被:浏览 42次   下载 20
Received:October 11, 2024   Published Online:January 20, 2025
中文摘要: 目的 分析早期黏膜下层贲门癌和非贲门癌的临床病理特点,评估内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗黏膜下层浸润早期胃癌的安全性及有效性。 方法 回顾性分析2014年1月到2019年12月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院接受ESD的黏膜下层浸润早期胃癌患者的临床资料,其中贲门癌202例(206个病灶),非贲门癌112例(119个病灶)。比较两组基本资料、病理特征、短期预后、长期预后。 结果 与非贲门癌组比较,贲门癌组患者年龄更大、有胃癌家族史比例更低(P<0.05);贲门癌病灶外观呈凹陷型、达到SM2浸润(浸润至黏膜层的深度>500μm)、合并中-重度萎缩性胃炎和伴深在性囊性胃炎比例更高(P<0.05);两组完整切除率(82.04% vs 81.51%, χ2 0.014, P=0.906)、治愈性切除率(38.83% vs 42.02%, χ2 0.318, P=0.573)差异无统计学意义,但是贲门癌垂直切缘阳性、病灶整块切除、术后狭窄发生率更高(P<0.05)。贲门癌组术后出血率为3.96%,非贲门癌组为5.36%,两组均无穿孔发生。两组ESD后的同时性癌、异时性癌、淋巴结转移和远处转移发生率均较低,且组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访至2020-07-15,除外失访病例,贲门癌和非贲门癌组总生存率(95.31% vs 97.20%)和疾病特异生存率(97.92% vs 97.20%)均较高,且组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 黏膜下层早期贲门癌和非贲门癌在临床病理特征方面存在差异;ESD治疗完整切除率较高,手术并发症少,术后复发率和转移率均较低,因此,ESD是二者治疗的有效方法。
Abstract:Objective To analyze the clinicopathological features of submucosal early cardia and non-cardia cancer,and evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating early gastric cancer (EGC) with submucosal infiltration. Methods The clinical data of EGC patients with submucosal infiltration who received ESD in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 202 cases of cardia cancer (206 lesions) and 112 cases of non-cardia cancer (119 lesions). The basic data, pathological features, short-term and long-term prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with non-cardia cancer group, in cardia cancer group,the patients had older age and a lower proportion of gastric cancer family history (P<0.05), and higher proportions of concave lesion appearance, infiltration depth achieved SM2 (depth of submucasal infiltration>500μm), moderate-to-severe atrophic gastritis and deep cystic gastritis (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in complete resection rate (82.04%vs 81.51%,χ2 0.014,P=0.906), curative resection rate (38.83%vs 42.02%,χ2 0.318,P=0.573) between cardia cancer group and non-cardia cancer group, but the incidences of positive vertical margin, en bloc resection and postoperative stenosis of cardia cancer group were higher (P<0.05). The postoperative bleeding rate was 3.96% in cardia cancer group and 5.36% in non-cardia cancer group, and no perforation occurred in either group. The incidences of synchronous cancer, metachronous cancer, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis after ESD in the two groups were low, and no statistical difference was found (P>0.05). Follow-up to July 15, 2020, except for the lost cases, the overall survival rate (95.31%vs 97.20%) and disease-specific survival rate (97.92%vs 97.20%) were all high in cardia cancer and non-cardiac cancer groups,and showed no statistically significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Early-stage cardia cancer and non-cardia cancer with submucosal infiltration exhibit different clinicopathological features. ESD is an effective treatment for the two, due to its high complete resection rate, few surgical complications, and low postoperative recurrence and metastasis rates.
文章编号:     中图分类号:R735.2    文献标志码:A
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(82170548);2021年省级重点研发计划(社会发展)专项资金项目(BE2021601)
引用文本:


Scan with WeChat

Scan with WeChat