本文已被:浏览 102次 下载 58次
Received:January 22, 2024 Published Online:October 20, 2024
Received:January 22, 2024 Published Online:October 20, 2024
中文摘要: 目的 探讨在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)患者中应用中文版身体形象障碍量表(BIDQ)评估的信度和效度。
方法 采用便利抽样法,选取2021年1月至2022年12月就诊于江苏省肿瘤医院淋巴水肿门诊的BCRL患者作为研究对象,采用中文版BIDQ进行问卷调查,评价量表的信度和效度。
结果 共纳入90例BCRL患者,最终有效问卷86例,有效回收率为95.56%。中文版BIDQ包括7个条目,量表的条目水平内容效度指数(I-CVI)值为0.84~1.00,量表水平内容效度指数(S-CVI)值为0.938。中文版BIDQ量表的Cronbachs α系数为0.846(P<0.01),各条目的Cronbachs α系数为0.724~0.861,总量表的奇偶折半系数为0.877。采用主成分分析和最大方差法对纳入数据进行正交旋转法检验,提取2个因子,特征根分别为3.434、1.341,贡献率分别为48.173%、17.469%,累计贡献率达到65.642%,各条目因子载荷均>0.500。重测信度上,在首次问卷调查结束后2周,进行了第2次问卷调查,结果显示,两次问卷调查的量表总分及各条目得分之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
结论 中文版BIDQ量表具有较高的信效度,可用于BCRL患者身体形象的评估。
Abstract:ObjectiveTo explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the body image disturbance questionnaire(BIDQ) in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL).
Methods BCRL patients who visited the lymphedema clinic of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the research subjects by convenience sampling method, and the Chinese version of the BIDQ was used for questionnaire surveys to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale.
Results A total of 90 patients with BCRL were included, and 86 had valid questionnaires, with an effective recovery rate of 95.56%. The Chinese version of the BIDQ included 7 items, with the item level content validity index (I-CVI) of the scale values ranging from 0.84 to 1.00 and the scale level content validity index (S-CVI) value of 0.938. The Cronbachs α coefficient of the Chinese version of the BIDQ scale was 0.846 (P<0.01), with Cronbachs α coefficients for individual items ranging from 0.724 to 0.861, and the odd-even split coefficient of the total scale was 0.877. Principal component analysis and maximum variance method were used for orthogonal rotation testing of the included data, extracting 2 factors with eigenvalues of 3.434 and 1.341, contributing rates of 48.173% and 17.469%, respectively, and a cumulative contribution rate reaching 65.642%. The factor loadings of each item were all >0.500. In terms of retest reliability, the second questionnaire survey was conducted two weeks after the end of the first questionnaire, and the results showed that there was no significant difference between the first and second guestionnaries in the total score of the scale and the scores of each item (P>0.05).
Conclusion The Chinese version of the BIDQ scale demonstrates high reliability and validity, and can be used for the assessment of body image in patients with BCRL.
keywords: Breast cancer Breast cancer-related lymphedema Body image disturbance questionnaire Reliability Validity
文章编号: 中图分类号:R737.9 文献标志码:A
基金项目:江苏省自然科学基金青年项目(BK20191078);南京医科大学肿瘤护理研究分中心开放课题(NYZLKF-2-202103);江苏省肿瘤医院课题(ZH202004)
Author Name | Affiliation |
WANG Na, LI Jian, YANG Lifang | Lymphedema Clinic of Stomy Wound, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210018, China |
Author Name | Affiliation |
WANG Na, LI Jian, YANG Lifang | Lymphedema Clinic of Stomy Wound, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210018, China |
引用文本: