###
中国临床研究英文版:2021,34(8):1061-1064
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
前列地尔联合西洛他唑、莫匹罗星治疗老年糖尿病足的效果
(南京医科大学附属老年医院内分泌科,江苏 南京 210000)
Effect of alprostadil combined with cilostazol and mupirocin in the treatment of elderly patients with diabetic foot
(Department of Endocrinology,Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210000,China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 743次   下载 687
Received:April 11, 2020   Published Online:August 20, 2021
中文摘要: 目的 探讨前列地尔联合西洛他唑、莫匹罗星治疗老年糖尿病足患者的效果。方法 选取2012年1月至2020年1月于南京医科大学附属老年医院住院诊治的糖尿病足老年患者64例,按照纳入和排除标准进行筛选,对符合要求的51例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。暴露组20例为前列地尔治疗基础上加用西洛他唑、莫匹罗星,非暴露组31例为单用前列地尔治疗。出院前比较两组各项临床指标、治疗时长及糖尿病足治疗总有效率。结果 基线尿微量白蛋白/肌酐(UACR)水平暴露组[71.00(43.50,172.83)mg/g]高于非暴露组[48.90(31.50,60.00)mg/g],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);非暴露组足背动脉搏动减弱或消失发生率稍高于暴露组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。暴露组和非暴露组治疗时长分别为(10.71±3.79)d、(12.60±4.72)d,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。暴露组总有效率高于非暴露组,差异有统计学意义(90.00% vs 64.52%,P<0.05)。两组均未发现明显药物不良反应。结论 前列地尔联合西洛他唑、莫匹罗星治疗糖尿病足较前列地尔治疗总有效率更高,且联合治疗有缩短治疗时长的趋势,这可能与药物联合应用更加针对糖尿病足的发病机制有关。
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of alprostadil combined with cilostazol and mupirocin in the treatment of elderly patients with diabetic foot.Methods Out of 64 elderly patients with diabetic feet hospitalized between January 2012 and January 2020,51 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected and retrospectively studied.The patients were categorized as exposed group (n=20) and non-exposed group (n=31).Cilostazol and mupirocin were used on the basis of alprostadil in exposed group,while alprostadil alone was used in non-exposed group.The clinical indexes,treatment duration and total effective rate were compared between two groups.Results The baseline level of urinary micro albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) in exposed group was significantly higher than that in non-exposed group [71.00 (43.50,172.83) mg/g vs 48.90 (31.50,60.00) mg/g,P< 0.05].The incidence of unpalpable dorsalis pedis artery pulse in non- exposed group was slightly higher than that in exposed group (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in treatment duration between exposed group and non -exposed group [(10.71±3.79)d vs (12.60±4.72)d,P>0.05).The total effective rate in exposed group was significant higher than that in non-exposed group (90.00% vs 64.52%,P<0.05).No obvious adverse drug reactions occurred in both groups.conclusions The total effective rate of combined drug treatment is higher,with a shorter treatment duration,which may be related to its mechanism being more targeted at the pathogenesis of diabetic foot.
文章编号:     中图分类号:R587.2    文献标志码:A
基金项目:前列地尔联合西洛他唑、莫匹罗星治疗老年糖尿病足的效果
引用文本:


Scan with WeChat

Scan with WeChat