###
中国临床研究:2024,37(4):534-539
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
瑞马唑仑联合米库氯铵对声带息肉切除术后患者恢复质量的影响
(1. 新乡医学院第四临床学院麻醉与围术期医学科,河南 新乡 453000;2. 新乡医学院,河南 新乡 453000)
Effects of remimazolam combined with mivacurium on recovery quality of patients after vocal cord polypectomy
摘要
本文已被:浏览 1214次   下载 242
投稿时间:2024-01-02   网络发布日期:2024-04-20
中文摘要: 目的 采用15项恢复质量评分量表(QoR-15)评估对比瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚对支撑喉镜下声带息肉切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响。 方法 选择2022年12月至2023年10月新乡医学院第四临床学院行支撑喉镜下声带息肉切除术患者90例,采用随机区组设计法随机分为瑞马唑仑联合米库氯铵组(R组)和丙泊酚联合米库氯铵组(P组),每组45例。通过静脉给药,R组患者给予瑞马唑仑0.2~0.3 mg/kg,P组患者给予丙泊酚1.5~2.0 mg/kg,待患者睫毛反射消失后,均给予舒芬太尼0.3 μg/kg、米库氯铵0.25 mg/kg。于手术前1d、术后第1天、术后第2天,采用QoR-15量表评估患者术后恢复质量。记录两组患者不同时间点的平均动脉压、心率、脉搏血氧饱和度、改良警觉/镇静量表(MOAA/S)评分;记录各项所需时间[包括手术、术后自主呼吸恢复、气管导管拔除以及麻醉后监测治疗室(PACU)停留];记录术中及术后不良反应发生情况。 结果 R组患者术后1 d的QoR-15量表评分低于P组(P<0.05),由于QoR-15量表评分最小临床意义变化值为6分,所以其不具有临床意义;R组患者恢复自主呼吸时间、拔管时间长于P组(P<0.05),两组PACU停留时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);R组患者低血压、注射部位疼痛发生率低于P组(24.4% vs 64.4%, χ2=14.580, P<0.01; 6.7% vs 84.4%, χ2=54.878, P<0.01),其他不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 在支撑喉镜下声带息肉切除术麻醉中,使用瑞马唑仑的患者术后恢复质量与丙泊酚相当,在满足围术期需要的同时,能够维持更加稳定的血流动力学,且无明显的注射部位疼痛情况,能提高患者围术期的舒适度。
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of remimazolam versus propofol on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing vocal cord polypectomy with supportive laryngoscopy by the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15). Methods A total of 90 patients who underwent vocal cord polypectomy with supported laryngoscopy from the Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical University from December 2022 to October 2023 were divided into remimazolam combined with mivacurium group (group R) and propofol combined with mivacurium group (group P) by random block design method, with 45 cases in each group. By intravenous administration, patients in group R and group P were given remiazolam 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg and propofol 1.5 to 2.0 mg/kg, respectively. After the disappearance of eyelash reflex, sufentanil 0.3 g/kg and mivacurium 0.25 mg/kg were given to all patients. The quality of postoperative recovery was evaluated by the QoR-15 scale 1 day before, 1 day and 2 days after surgery. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation, and Modified Observers Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) scores of the two groups were recorded at different time points. The time required including surgery, recovery of spontaneous breathing, endotracheal tube removal, and post anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay after surgery,and the occurrence of intra- and post-operative adverse reactions were recorded. Results The QoR-15 scale score of group R was lower than that of group P (P<0.05) on the first day after surgery, but it was not clinically significant because the minimum clinically significant change value of QoR-15 scale score was 6 points. The recovery time of spontaneous breathing and extubation time in group R were longer than those in group P (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in PACU stay time between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidences of hypotension and injection site pain in group R were lower than those in group P (24.4% vs 64.4%, χ2=14.580, P<0.01; 6.7% vs 84.4%, χ2=54.878, P<0.01), and no significant difference was found in the incidence of other adverse reactions (P>0.05). Conclusion In the anesthesia of vocal cord polypectomy under supported laryngoscopy, the quality of patients recovery using remimazolam is comparable to that of propofol. While meeting perioperative needs, it can maintain more stable hemodynamics, without significant injection site pain, and can improve perioperative patients comfort.
文章编号:     中图分类号:R614.2+.4    文献标志码:A
基金项目:新乡医学院研究生科研创新支持计划(YJSCX202261Y)
引用文本:
焦钟雨,王培山,孟瑞霞,等.瑞马唑仑联合米库氯铵对声带息肉切除术后患者恢复质量的影响[J].中国临床研究,2024,37(4):534-539.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫