###
中国临床研究:2024,37(3):414-417
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
腹腔镜下三种方式处理急性阑尾炎术后阑尾根部的比较研究
(南通大学杏林学院附属南京江北医院普外科,江苏 南京 210048)
Comparative study of three ways for treating the appendiceal stump after acute appendicitis under laparoscopy
(Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University Xinglin College, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210048, China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 426次   下载 268
投稿时间:2023-12-22   网络发布日期:2024-03-20
中文摘要: 目的 探讨荷包缝合、Hem-o-lok夹闭和双道丝线结扎三种方法处理阑尾根部的优劣。方法 对南京江北医院2021年7月至2023年4月收住的237例行腹腔镜下阑尾切除术的急性阑尾炎患者进行回顾性分析,根据手术缝合方式分为荷包缝合组(n=48)、Hem-o-lok夹闭组(n=152)和双道丝线结扎组(n=37)。比较三种不同根部处理方法的患者基线资料、手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数、住院总费用和术后并发症发生情况。结果 三组患者手术时间、术中出血量及住院天数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组间住院总费用差异有统计学意义(F=5.823,P=0.003),且双道丝线结扎组的住院总费用为(9 809.1±1 199.7)元,显著低于荷包缝合组的(10 355.0±1 133.7)元和Hem-o-lok夹闭组的(10 541.6±1 179.3)元(P<0.05)。术后并发症方面,荷包缝合组发生率为2.1%(1/48),Hem-o-lok夹闭组发生率为2.0%(3/152),双道丝线结扎组发生率为2.7%(1/37),三组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 荷包缝合、Hem-o-lok夹闭和双道丝线结扎三种方法处理阑尾根部均安全有效,但双道丝线结扎花费更少。
Abstract:Objective To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of purse-string suture, Hem-o-lok clip and double thread ligation in the treatment of appendiceal stump. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 237 acute appendicitis patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital from July 2021 to April 2023. According to the treatment, the patients were divided into purse-string suture group (n=48), Hem-o-lok clip group (n=152) and double thread ligation group (n=37). The baseline data, surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization costs, and incidence of postoperative complications among three different treatment methods were compared. Results There was no significant in operation time, blood loss, and hospital stay among three groups (P>0.05). there was significant difference in total hospitalization cost among three groups (F=5.823, P=0.003), and that in double thread ligation group was (9 809.1±1 199.7) yuan, which was significantly lower than that in the purse-string suture group [(10 355.0±1 133.7) yuan] and Hem-o-lok clip group [(10 541.6±1 179.3) yuan] (P<0.05). The incidence of complications in the purse string suture group was 2.1% (1/48), the Hem-o-lok clip group was 2.0% (3/152), and the double thread ligation group was 2.7% (1/37). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (P>0.05). Conclusion The three methods to secure the appendiceal stump are safe and effective, but double thread ligation is cost-saving than purse-string suture and Hem-o-lok clip.
文章编号:     中图分类号:R656.8    文献标志码:A
基金项目:
附件
引用文本:
郑立锋,刘宗航,徐子宇,张吴楼,周澍,张业鹏,顾熙.腹腔镜下三种方式处理急性阑尾炎术后阑尾根部的比较研究[J].中国临床研究,2024,37(3):414-417.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫