###
中国临床研究:2023,36(11):1636-1639
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
人工智能系统与甲状腺影像报告和数据系统预测甲状腺癌
(1. 徐州市中心医院 东南大学附属徐州医院 徐州医科大学徐州临床学院肝胆胰中心,江苏 徐州 221009;2. 徐州市中心医院 东南大学附属徐州医院 徐州医科大学徐州临床学院新城甲乳外科,江苏 徐州 221009)
Artificial intelligence system and TI-RADS grading system in predicting thyroid cancer
摘要
本文已被:浏览 819次   下载 196
投稿时间:2023-06-02   网络发布日期:2023-11-20
中文摘要: 目的 研究人工智能(AI)系统与甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)在甲状腺肿瘤良恶性诊断中的价值。方法 构建AI系统,并回顾性分析2020年1月至2021年12月徐州市中心医院行甲状腺外科手术的患者共500例,收集患者基本信息、手术信息、AI分级指标、TI-RADS分级、术后病理情况,比较AI及TI-RADS预测甲状腺癌的准确率。结果 500例患者中,甲状腺癌390例,良性结节110例。AI预测甲状腺癌准确率为88.5%,预测良性肿瘤准确率为87.3%,总体准确率为88.2%。TI-RADS预测甲状腺癌准确率为80.3%,预测良性肿瘤准确率为80.9%,总体预测准确率为80.4%。AI系统对恶性、总体预测准确率均高于TI-RADS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AI系统对乳头状癌的预测准确率高于TI-RADS(89.9% vs 81.2%, χ2=10.525,P<0.05),对滤泡状癌、髓样癌、未分化癌的预测准确率与TI-RADS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 AI系统与TI-RADS在甲状腺癌的诊断中有着重要的价值,AI系统比TI-RADS具有更高的准确率,并且在甲状腺癌不同亚型中有着类似的结果。
Abstract:Objective To study the value of artificial intelligence (AI) systems and Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid tumors. Methods An AI system was developed, and a retrospective analysis was conducted on 500 patients who underwent thyroid surgery at Xuzhou Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Patient demographics, surgical information, AI grading indicators, TI-RADS classifications, and postoperative pathological findings were collected. The accuracy of AI and TI-RADS in predicting thyroid cancer was compared. Results Among the 500 patients, 390 were diagnosed with thyroid cancer and 110 were benign nodules. The AI achieved an accuracy of 88.5% in predicting thyroid cancer and 87.3% in predicting benign tumors, with an overall accuracy of 88.2%. The TI-RADS had a predictive accuracy of 80.3% for thyroid cancer and 80.9% for benign tumors, with an overall predictive accuracy of 80.4%. The AI group had higher accuracy rates for malignancy and overall prediction compared to the TI-RADS group (P<0.05). The AI system had a higher accuracy rate for predicting papillary carcinoma compared to the TI-RADS (89.9% vs 81.2%, χ2=10.525,P<0.05), while no statistically significant differences were found in predicting follicular carcinoma, medullary carcinoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma compared to TI-RADS (P>0.05). Conclusion Both the AI system and TI-RADS have significant value in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. The AI system demonstrates higher accuracy compared to the TI-RADS grading system, and similar results are observed in different subtypes of thyroid cancer.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:A
基金项目:徐州医科大学附属医院科技发展基金(XYFY2020045)
引用文本:
王云,王聪,朱赛赛,等.人工智能系统与甲状腺影像报告和数据系统预测甲状腺癌[J].中国临床研究,2023,36(11):1636-1639.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫