###
中国临床研究:2023,36(1):70-75
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
剪切波弹性成像及血清学模型评估慢性肝病纤维化
(昆明医科大学附属甘美医院昆明市第一人民医院超声科,云南昆明650000)
Shear wave elastography and serological model in evaluating liver fibrosis of chronic liver disease
(DepartmentofUltrasound,TheFirstHospitalofKunming,Kunming,Yunnan650000,China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 667次   下载 467
投稿时间:2022-04-18   网络发布日期:2023-01-20
中文摘要: 目的探讨声触诊弹性成像(STE)、声触诊弹性测量(STQ)及天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比率指数(APRI)、基于4因子的纤维化指数(fibrosisindexbasedonthefourfactors,FIB-4指数)对慢性肝病纤维化的诊断效能及与病理的相关性。 方法选取2018年8月至2022年2月昆明市第一人民医院收治的符合研究条件的患者80例,行肝脏穿刺活检,穿刺前行STE、STQ检查得出肝硬度值(LSMSTE、LSMSTQ)中位数,收集肝穿刺活检前7d内的血清学指标,计算APRI和FIB-4,与肝脏穿刺活检病理结果对照,以病理结果为“金标准”,绘制F2期、F3期、F4期的LSMSTE、LSMSTQ和APRI、FIB-4诊断肝纤维化的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),并计算曲线下面积(AUC)及各期敏感度、特异度,AUC采用Delong法进行比较。应用Spearman相关系数评估LSMSTE、LSMSTQ、APRI、FIB-4与病理分期之间的相关性。 结果LSMSTE、LSMSTQ、APRI和FIB-4诊断慢性肝病肝纤维化的AUC分别为0.863、0.840、0.693、0.805;AUC比较发现,F2期、F3期、F4期LSMSTE、LSMSTQ诊断效能相当(P>0.05);F2期、F4期LSMSTE、LSMSTQ均优于APRI(P<0.05),与FIB-4诊断效能相当(P>0.05);F3期LSMSTE、LSMSTQ、FIB-4优于APRI(P<0.05)。LSMSTE诊断肝纤维化F2期、F3期、F4期的敏感度分别为80.0%、63.2%、81.3%,特异度分别为80.0%、83.3%、82.8%;LSMSTQ诊断肝纤维化F2期、F3期、F4期的敏感度分别为71.7%、76.3%、75.0%,特异度分别为90.0%、69.0%、93.7%。相关性分析结果显示,LSMSTE、LSMSTQ、FIB-4及APRI与肝纤维化程度分别呈正相关(r=0.630、0.646、0.470、0.293,P<0.05)。 结论LSMSTE、LSMSTQ、APRI及FIB-4均可用于临床评估慢性肝病肝纤维化程度,但剪切波弹性成像LSMSTE、LSMSTQ诊断效能明显优于血清学诊断模型APRI、FIB-4。
Abstract:ObjectiveToexplorethediagnosticefficacyofsoundtouchelastography(STE),soundtouchquantify(STQ),aspartateaminotransferase-to-plateletratioindex(APRI)andfibrosisindexbasedonthefourfactors(FIB-4index)inevaluatingthedegreeofliverfibrosisinpatientswithchronicliverdiseaseandthecorrelationbetweenthemandpathology. MethodsFromAugust2018toFebruary2022,80eligiblepatientswereselectedandunderwentliverbiopsyintheFirstHospitalofKunming.LSMSTEandLSMSTQwereobtainedbySTEandSTQexaminationbeforeliverbiopsy.Serologicalindexeswerecollectedwithin7daysbeforeliverbiopsyforAPRIandFIB-4.Takingthepathologicaldiagnosisofliverpuncturebiopsyasthegoldenstandard,theROCcurvesofLSMSTE,LSMSTQ,APRIandFIB-4forjudgingliverfibrosisinF2,F3andF4stagesweredrawed,andtheAUC,sensitivityandspecificityateachstagewerecalculated,withAUCbeingcomparedusingtheDelongmethod.TheassociationsofLSMSTE,LSMSTQ,APRIandFIB-4withpathologicalstageswereevaluatedbySpearmanscorrelationcoefficient. ResultsAUCsofLSMSTE,LSMSTQ,APRIandFIB-4indiagnosingliverfibrosiswere0.863,0.840,0.693and0.805,respectively.ThediagnosticperformancesofLSMSTEandLSMSTQweresimilarforjudgingliverfibrosisinF2,F3andF4stages(P>0.05).ThediagnosticperformancesofLSMSTEandLSMSTQweresuperiortoAPRIandwerecomparabletoFIB-4inF2andF4stages(P<0.05).InthediagnosticperformancesforF3stage,LSMSTE,LSMSTQandFIB-4weresignificantlybetterthanAPRI(P<0.05).IndiagnosingF2,F3andF4stagesofliverfibrosis,thesensitivityofLSMSTEwere80.0%,63.2%and81.3%,anditsspecificitywere80.0%,83.3%and82.8%,respectively;thesensitivityofLSMSTQwere71.7%,76.3%and75.0%,anditsspecificitywere90.0%,69.0%and93.7%,respectively.ThecorrelationanalysisshowedthatLSMSTE,LSMSTQ,FIB-4andAPRIwerepositivelycorrelatedwiththedegreeofliverfibrosis(r=0.630,0.646,0.470,0.293,P<0.05). ConclusionLSMSTE,LSMSTQ,APRIandFIB-4canbeusedtoevaluateliverfibrosisdegreeinchronicliverdiseaseinclinic,butthediagnosticefficacyofLSMSTEandLSMSTQisobviouslysuperiortothatofAPRIandFIB-4.
文章编号:     中图分类号:R575.2 R445.1    文献标志码:B
基金项目:云南省教育厅科学研究基金(2019J1296)
附件
引用文本:
丁世兰,朱成诚,肖春华,李鸿,李永峰,丁捷,杨皖东.剪切波弹性成像及血清学模型评估慢性肝病纤维化[J].中国临床研究,2023,36(1):70-75.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫