###
中国临床研究:2019,32(9):1185-1188
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术对肾功能不全患者肾脏功能的损伤比较
(广东高州市人民医院心外科,广东 茂名 525200)
Renal function impairment of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with renal dysfunction
(Department of Cardiac Surgery,Gaozhou People′s Hospital,Maoming,Guangdong 525200,China)
摘要
本文已被:浏览 737次   下载 370
投稿时间:2019-01-05   网络发布日期:2019-09-20
中文摘要: 目的探讨比较体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术对肾功能不全患者肾功能的影响。方法选取2015年12月至2018年10月接受冠状动脉旁路移植术的肾功能不全患者共120例,随机分为体外循环组和非体外循环组,每组60例。比较两组患者术后12 h、1 d、3 d、5 d的肾脏功能;比较患者术后恢复情况,包括术后插管时间、住ICU时间、输血量、总住院时间及术后并发症的发生率。结果两组患者术后12 h血肌酐水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术后1 d、 3 d和5 d,体外循环组患者血肌酐水平显著高于非体外循环组(P<0.05)。体外循环组患者术后有7例患者(11.67%)采用肾脏替代治疗,而非体外循环组中仅1例患者(1.67%)术后接受肾脏替代治疗,体外循环组患者的术后肾脏替代治疗发生率显著高于非体外循环组(P<0.05)。体外循环组患者术后气管插管时间、ICU住院时间、总住院时间均显著长于非体外循环组(P<0.05)。两组患者的术后输血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后心房颤动和二次开胸比例差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但体外循环组的感染率显著高于非体外循环组(P<0.05)。无术后住院死亡病例。结论与体外循环手术相比,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术在治疗冠状动脉心脏病合并慢性肾功能不全患者可降低患者术后接受肾脏替代治疗的风险,降低术后感染率,加快术后康复速度。
Abstract:Objective To investigate and compare the influences of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) surgery on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease(CHD) complicated with renal dysfunction. Methods A total of 120 CHD patients with renal dysfunction undergoing CABG surgery were recruited in this study and were randomly divided into off-pump CABG group and on-pump CABG group(n=60,each).The renal functions were monitored and compared at 12 hours,1-,3- and 5- day after surgery.The post-operative situations,including intubation time,ICU hospital stay,blood transfusion volume,total hospitalization time and incidence of complications were compared between two groups. Results The serum creatinine (Cr) levels were similar at 12 hours after operation between two groups (P>0.05),but were significantly higher in on-pump group than those in off-pump group at 1-,3- and 5-day after operation (all P<0.05).The incidence of renal replacement therapy in on-pump group was significantly higher than that in off-pump group [7/60(11.67%) vs 1/60(1.67%),P<0.05)].The time of tracheal intubation,ICU stay and total hospitalization in on-pump group were significantly longer than those in off-pump group (all P<0.05).There were no significant differences in blood transfusion volume and the proportions of atrial fibrillation and secondary thoracotomy between two groups (P>0.05).The infection rate in on-pump group was significantly higher than that in off-pump group (P<0.05).None of the patients died in hospital after operation. Conclusion Compared to on-pump CABG,off-pump CABG could reduce the risk of post-operative renal replacement therapy and infection and promote postoperative recovery in CHD patients with renal dysfunction.
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:A
基金项目:广东省医学科学技术研究基金(A2018475)
引用文本:
何勇,李中杰,刘光强,陈冲,谢学弟,黄创业.体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术对肾功能不全患者肾脏功能的损伤比较[J].中国临床研究,2019,32(9):1185-1188.

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫